Three stipulated thresholds The Δ1 SEED, BLOOM, and ROOT floors. These are design parameters, not thresholds derived from physical laws.
Coherence floor
SEED BLOOM ROOT
Three stipulated thresholds The Δ1 SEED, BLOOM, and ROOT floors. These are design parameters, not thresholds derived from physical laws. Tier on the horizontal axis, Γ floor on the vertical axis. The complete values are available in the data table below. 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Γ floor Tier Coherence floor: SEED, 0.7 Coherence floor: BLOOM, 0.819 Coherence floor: ROOT, 0.95 Coherence floor: SEED, 0.7 Coherence floor: BLOOM, 0.819 Coherence floor: ROOT, 0.95
Inspect a point, expand the data table, or download the exact values.
View data table 3 values Source & interpretation boundary Intent origination authority A structural allocation of signing authority, not a survey of participants. AI assistance does not confer independent origination.
Signing authority
Human Agency
Intent origination authority A structural allocation of signing authority, not a survey of participants. AI assistance does not confer independent origination. Authority on the horizontal axis, Relative share on the vertical axis. The complete values are available in the data table below. 0 0.27 0.54 0.81 1.08 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Relative share Authority Signing authority: Human Agency, 1 Signing authority: AI instrument, 0 Signing authority: Automation, 0 Signing authority: Human Agency, 1 Signing authority: AI instrument, 0 Signing authority: Automation, 0
Inspect a point, expand the data table, or download the exact values.
View data table 3 values Source & interpretation boundary A cycle’s distribution of effort The original phase-allocation example, retained as illustrative percentages. Δ1 does not prescribe these proportions.
Elapsed time Effort
Intention Work Record
A cycle’s distribution of effort The original phase-allocation example, retained as illustrative percentages. Δ1 does not prescribe these proportions. Phase on the horizontal axis, Illustrative % on the vertical axis. The complete values are available in the data table below. 0 24.3 48.6 72.9 97.2 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Illustrative % Phase Elapsed time: Intention, 5 Elapsed time: Work, 75 Elapsed time: Record, 20 Elapsed time: Intention, 5 Elapsed time: Work, 75 Elapsed time: Record, 20 Effort: Intention, 2 Effort: Work, 90 Effort: Record, 8 Effort: Intention, 2 Effort: Work, 90 Effort: Record, 8
Inspect a point, expand the data table, or download the exact values.
View data table 6 values Source & interpretation boundary The coherence floor An equation-threshold illustration. Meeting the coherence floor alone does not establish that all Five Guardian Gates have passed.
Threshold outcome
The coherence floor An equation-threshold illustration. Meeting the coherence floor alone does not establish that all Five Guardian Gates have passed. Γ input on the horizontal axis, Floor met: 1 / not met: 0 on the vertical axis. The complete values are available in the data table below. 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 0.4 0.538 0.675 0.813 0.95 Floor met: 1 / not met: 0 Γ input Threshold outcome: 0.4, 0 Threshold outcome: 0.55, 0 Threshold outcome: 0.7, 1 Threshold outcome: 0.82, 1 Threshold outcome: 0.95, 1 Threshold outcome: 0.4, 0 Threshold outcome: 0.55, 0 Threshold outcome: 0.7, 1 Threshold outcome: 0.82, 1 Threshold outcome: 0.95, 1
Inspect a point, expand the data table, or download the exact values.
View data table 5 values Source & interpretation boundary Sequence is not transformation The old two-clock example, clearly labelled as a scenario: sequence advances every step; the illustrative proof count advances only on qualifying work.
Sequence Illustrative proof count
Inspect a point, expand the data table, or download the exact values.
View data table 16 values Source & interpretation boundary Fractal Fabric property illustration Original website example scores, preserved for comparison - not benchmarks, measurements, or confirmed performance claims.
Illustration only
Replay proof
Fractal Fabric property illustration Original website example scores, preserved for comparison - not benchmarks, measurements, or confirmed performance claims. Illustrated property on the horizontal axis, Legacy example score on the vertical axis. The complete values are available in the data table below. 0 27 54 81 108 1 2 3 4 5 Legacy example score Illustrated property Illustration only: Causal links, 95 Illustration only: Immutability, 100 Illustration only: Query speed, 85 Illustration only: Replay proof, 100 Illustration only: Non-linear, 90 Illustration only: Causal links, 95 Illustration only: Immutability, 100 Illustration only: Query speed, 85 Illustration only: Replay proof, 100 Illustration only: Non-linear, 90
Inspect a point, expand the data table, or download the exact values.
View data table 5 values Source & interpretation boundary Measurement is not token voting The legacy conceptual weight diagram. It illustrates the separation of coherence measurement from token balances; it is not observed consensus telemetry.
Conceptual allocation
Coherence
Measurement is not token voting The legacy conceptual weight diagram. It illustrates the separation of coherence measurement from token balances; it is not observed consensus telemetry. Basis on the horizontal axis, Illustrative relative weight on the vertical axis. The complete values are available in the data table below. 0 0.27 0.54 0.81 1.08 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Illustrative relative weight Basis Conceptual allocation: Coherence, 1 Conceptual allocation: Token voting, 0 Conceptual allocation: Majority rule, 0 Conceptual allocation: Coherence, 1 Conceptual allocation: Token voting, 0 Conceptual allocation: Majority rule, 0
Inspect a point, expand the data table, or download the exact values.
View data table 3 values Source & interpretation boundary Diagnostic scenario A retained demonstration dataset - not current system health. “Deficit” is used instead of labelling the arbitrary example score as physical entropy.
Example value Example comparison
Diagnostic scenario A retained demonstration dataset - not current system health. “Deficit” is used instead of labelling the arbitrary example score as physical entropy. Scenario metric on the horizontal axis, Illustrative score on the vertical axis. The complete values are available in the data table below. 0 25.38 50.76 76.14 101.52 1 1.75 2.5 3.25 4 Illustrative score Scenario metric Example value: 1, 12 Example value: 2, 5 Example value: 3, 3 Example value: 4, 94 Example value: 1, 12 Example value: 2, 5 Example value: 3, 3 Example value: 4, 94 Example comparison: 1, 30 Example comparison: 2, 20 Example comparison: 3, 25 Example comparison: 4, 70 Example comparison: 1, 30 Example comparison: 2, 20 Example comparison: 3, 25 Example comparison: 4, 70
Inspect a point, expand the data table, or download the exact values.
View data table 8 values Source & interpretation boundary Transactional sequence The original illustrative series in arbitrary units. Not market data, a forecast, or a claim of investment performance.
Transactional illustration
Inspect a point, expand the data table, or download the exact values.
View data table 8 values Source & interpretation boundary Accumulated transformation The original stepwise illustration of an accumulating record. Values are illustrative, not FLUX prices or measured ctu.
Record illustration
Inspect a point, expand the data table, or download the exact values.
View data table 8 values Source & interpretation boundary The symbolic emission ratio The stated per-cycle ratio FLUX = 100Γ, shown only at and above the coherence floor. No minting or settlement takes place.
100Γ
Inspect a point, expand the data table, or download the exact values.
View data table 8 values Source & interpretation boundary Coherence and its deficit Δdef = 1 minus Γ. This dimensionless complement is not thermodynamic entropy or Shannon entropy.
Coherence Coherence deficit
Inspect a point, expand the data table, or download the exact values.
View data table 22 values Source & interpretation boundary A transformation-cycle scenario A demonstration series crossing the three stipulated boundaries. It is not a record of real Human Agencies or protocol seals.
Scenario coherence
Inspect a point, expand the data table, or download the exact values.
View data table 9 values Source & interpretation boundary Temporal debt in the denominator Equation-only sensitivity with E = V = A = 1 and λreg = 1. This does not run the complete reference engine.
1 / (1 + τ)
Inspect a point, expand the data table, or download the exact values.
View data table 21 values Source & interpretation boundary Carnot: a separate physical relationship η = 1 minus Tc/Th. This theoretical heat-engine relationship does not derive the protocol’s SEED floor.
Carnot relationship
Inspect a point, expand the data table, or download the exact values.
View data table 11 values Source & interpretation boundary Landauer: energy, not a Γ threshold kBT ln 2 joules per erased bit as a function of temperature. This relationship does not derive the BLOOM value 0.8187.
kBT ln 2
Inspect a point, expand the data table, or download the exact values.
View data table 6 values Source & interpretation boundary The c² dimensional reference A normalised proportional illustration of the constant 8.987551787368176 × 10¹⁶ m²/s². No engine-to-relativity mechanism is implied.
Dimensional reference
Inspect a point, expand the data table, or download the exact values.
View data table 5 values Source & interpretation boundary A sequence approaching φ Ratios of consecutive Fibonacci numbers illustrate convergence. The protocol’s use of φ is a declared scale convention, not a physical necessity.
Consecutive-number ratio
Inspect a point, expand the data table, or download the exact values.
View data table 10 values Source & interpretation boundary The cycloid reference model A geometric illustration with r = 1: x = θ minus sin θ; y = 1 minus cos θ. It is not a measurement output or a Γ derivation.
Cycloid
Inspect a point, expand the data table, or download the exact values.
View data table 41 values Source & interpretation boundary